Posted in

The Brutal Last Hours of the Female Camp Guards of Ravensbruck *WARNING REAL FOOTAGE

Many people assumed that when the Nazi camps  were liberated, the worst was finally over.

But for the female guards of Ravensbr ck,  it wasn t.

Because what happened next,   inside a prison in a small German town, would  reveal exactly how far ordinary women had fallen,   and what it looked like when the world  finally decided to hold them accountable.

Ravensbr ck was built specifically to hold women.

It was the first and only concentration camp for   women located inside the borders of Nazi Germany.

The order to build it came from Heinrich Himmler,   the head of the SS, in 1938.

The site was chosen  near the small town of F rstenberg because it was   isolated and far from public view.

What happened  there was never meant to be seen by outsiders.

The first prisoners arrived on May  18, 1939.

There were 867 women,   transferred from Lichtenburg, an old castle  in Saxony that had been used as a temporary   women’s prison camp since 1938.

Most were  political prisoners.

They included German   women labeled enemies of the Nazi state,  such as Communists, Social Democrats,   Jehovah’s Witnesses, Roma women, and others  the Nazi system classified as criminals.

The definition was broad enough to include  almost anyone who did not fit Nazi expectations.

To guard these women, the Third Reich needed  women.

SS rules did not allow male guards to   directly supervise female prisoners,  so as soon as Ravensbr ck opened,   the SS began recruiting female staff.

They were called Aufseherinnen,   meaning female overseers, and the positions  were advertised openly across Germany.

The requirements were simple.

Applicants had  to be German citizens, physically healthy,   and at least 21 years old.

No previous  experience was needed.

The pay was better   than what many women could earn  in factories or domestic service,   where most recruits came from.

They received  a uniform, housing inside or near the camp,   and a level of authority that few working-class  German women had ever experienced before.

The first group of female guards arrived at  Ravensbr ck in 1939 alongside the prisoners.

By 1940, the SS had created a formal training  program at the camp.

New recruits spent several   weeks on probation.

During that time, they  watched and then took part in the daily control   of prisoners.

They observed punishment beatings.

They stood through roll calls.

Most importantly,   they were repeatedly taught that the women  wearing striped prison uniforms were not   ordinary human beings.

They were described as  racial enemies, political threats, or criminals.

During the war, more than 4,000 women completed  guard training at Ravensbr ck.

The camp became   the main training center for female  guards across the entire concentration   camp system.

Graduates were sent to camps  such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bergen-Belsen,   Majdanek, Neuengamme, Flossenb  rg, and dozens of smaller camps.

Life inside Ravensbr ck was far from normal.

Roll call took place twice a day, once at dawn   and again at dusk.

Prisoners had to stand in  the main assembly yard no matter the weather   or their physical condition.

During winter, that  meant standing for hours in temperatures below   freezing.

Women with high fevers, women suffering  from infected wounds, and women already weakened   by starvation were all forced to remain standing.

If the number of prisoners did not match the SS   records, nobody was allowed to move until the  count was corrected.

Waiting four hours was   common.

Sometimes it lasted five or six hours.

Any movement or noise could lead to a beating.

The workday usually began around 4:30  in the morning and lasted until dark.

Some prisoners were sent outside the camp  for hard labor such as road construction,   drainage projects, or building work.

Others  worked inside the camp in industrial jobs.

Beginning in 1942, the German electrical company  Siemens operated a factory next to the camp and   used prisoner labor to produce equipment and  components for the German military.

Women often   worked 12-hour shifts there.

Siemens paid the SS  for their labor.

The prisoners received nothing.

Food was extremely limited.

A typical daily ration  consisted of a bowl of thin turnip or nettle soup,   a small piece of bread, and sometimes a little  margarine or a spoonful of beet jam.

Altogether,   it provided about 1,300 calories a day for  women performing exhausting physical labor.

The result was starvation.

Many women  lost 20, 30, or even 40 pounds within   a few months.

When they became too weak  to work, they were sent to the Revier,   the camp infirmary.

It had very little  medicine and almost no ability to treat   serious illness.

For many prisoners, it was  simply a place where death came more slowly.

The official punishment for breaking camp rules,  such as arriving late to roll call, speaking when   not allowed, or being caught with extra food, was  flogging.

Prisoners received 25 lashes across the   back or the backs of their thighs.

The blows were  delivered with a cane or leather strap by a guard   or SS officer while the prisoner was bent over  a wooden block.

These punishments were carried   out in front of other prisoners as a warning.

The victim had to count each lash out loud.

If she lost count or cried out without counting,  the punishment started again from the beginning.

The female overseers also had the power  to hand out unofficial punishments   whenever they wanted.

No reports,  paperwork, or approval were required.

Out of the more than 4,000 female guards,  a smaller group rose to positions of   power and became directly linked to  some of the camp’s worst violence.

One of them was Dorothea Binz.

She arrived  at Ravensbr ck in 1939 when she was just 19   years old.

She grew up in the nearby town of  Alt Lychen and took the job partly because it   was close to home.

Within two years she had been  promoted.

By 1943, she had become Lagerf hrerin,   the chief female overseer of the entire women’s  camp and the highest-ranking female position   at Ravensbr ck.

She was only 23 years old.

Survivors described her walking through the   camp carrying a dog whip and accompanied  by a German Shepherd.

They said she often   selected prisoners for beatings without any  clear reason, watched floggings with visible   enjoyment, and was personally seen  shooting prisoners in the camp yard.

Another woman was Greta B sel.

She supervised  the outside work details beginning in 1941.

One of her main jobs was deciding whether  prisoners were healthy enough to work.

Women she judged too sick or too weak were  labeled *Arbeitsunf hig*, meaning unfit for   labor.

Inside Ravensbr ck’s system, that label  usually meant a prisoner was no longer considered   useful.

What happened to those women afterward  often followed directly from her decision.

Elisabeth Marshall served as the chief  overseer of the Uckermark subcamp,   located about two kilometers from the main  Ravensbr ck camp.

Uckermark had originally   been built as a detention center for young  women.

In late 1944, the SS turned it into a   place where prisoners considered unwanted  were sent.

These included elderly women,   seriously ill women, and women the  SS simply decided were no longer   needed.

Marshall was in charge while the camp  effectively became a place of mass killing.

Vera Salvequart was a trained nurse who worked  in the camp’s medical block.

According to   postwar testimony, she gave patients in  the sick ward a white powder believed to   be phenol or a similar chemical.

She  told the prisoners it was medicine.

Carmen Mory was different from the others.

She was  Swiss-German and arrived at Ravensbr ck in 1941 as   a prisoner after being convicted of espionage.

The SS later made her a *Block lteste*, or block   elder.

This meant she was still a prisoner but was  given authority over other prisoners in exchange   for helping the camp administration.

Mory used  that position to beat women under her control,   report them for offenses they had not  committed, and deny food to sick prisoners.

Ruth Neudeck was another female guard  who took charge of the Uckermark   subcamp during its deadliest period  in early 1945.

Under her supervision,   prisoners were deliberately starved at a faster  rate and sent in groups to the gas chamber.

Emma Zimmer was a senior overseer who had worked  at Ravensbr ck since 1940.

During her five years   there, she was involved in beatings, supervised  floggings, and took part in prisoner selections.

Ida Schreiter, another senior overseer, held  important responsibilities during the period   when the camp was at its most overcrowded  and when deaths were at their highest.

For most of Ravensbr ck’s existence, prisoners  died through starvation, disease, exhaustion,   abuse, and occasional shootings.

Unlike  camps such as Auschwitz or Treblinka,   Ravensbr ck did not have a gas  chamber during most of its operation.

That changed in the autumn of 1944.

By September 1944, Germany’s military situation  was collapsing.

The Soviet Army had pushed into   Poland, while Allied forces were advancing through  France.

It was becoming clear that Germany was   losing the war.

At the same time, the SS began  trying to hide evidence of its crimes.

Records   were burned, death certificates were altered,  and at Ravensbr ck, a gas chamber was built.

The gas chamber was relatively small and was  created inside a converted building near the   edge of the camp.

Prisoners were brought  there in groups and often told they were   being disinfected or transferred elsewhere.

Most of the killings took place at night.

The SS kept almost no official records  of the operation.

Historians estimate   that between 5,000 and 6,000 women were  murdered in the Ravensbr ck gas chamber,   with most of the killings taking  place between January and April 1945.

At the same time, beginning in February 1945, the  SS started emptying the camp through a series of   forced marches.

Prisoners who could barely stand  were driven out of the gates and forced west   across Germany.

Conditions were terrible.

Northern  Germany was experiencing freezing temperatures,   snow, and ice.

Women who collapsed during  the marches were often shot where they fell.

Guards who had spent years carrying  out beatings, roll calls, and prisoner   selections inside the camp continued  doing the same things on the open roads.

The Soviet Army reached Ravensbr ck on April  30, 1945.

By then, the gas chamber had been   partly dismantled, most SS personnel had escaped,  and around 3,000 prisoners who were too sick to   march had been left behind.

Soviet soldiers  found them still inside the camp barracks.

The camp commandant, SS-Obersturmbannf hrer Fritz  Suhren, left Ravensbr ck on April 28 with several   prisoners in his vehicle.

He apparently believed  he could use them as bargaining chips if he was   captured.

American forces arrested him a few  days later.

Because some of his victims were   French citizens, he was tried by a French  court and was hanged in Paris in June 1950.

The British military tribunal investigating  crimes committed at Ravensbr ck opened in   Hamburg on December 5, 1946.

The location  was chosen because Hamburg was inside the   British occupation zone after the war, and  British authorities had responsibility for   many former Ravensbr ck staff members.

The trial was part of a larger series of   British war crimes proceedings known as the  Royal Warrant trials.

These ran alongside   the famous Nuremberg trials but focused on  camp personnel rather than top Nazi leaders.

The first Ravensbr ck trial lasted until  February 3, 1947.

Sixteen people were charged:   nine men and seven women.

They  were accused of killing, abusing,   mistreating, and causing suffering to Allied  citizens who had been imprisoned at the camp.

The focus on Allied prisoners was largely a  legal matter because British courts had the   strongest authority over crimes committed  against citizens of Allied nations.

The prosecution relied heavily on  survivor testimony.

Women who had   survived Ravensbr ck traveled to Hamburg and gave  detailed accounts of what they had witnessed.

They   identified guards, described specific incidents,  and provided dates whenever they could remember   them.

Defense lawyers tried to challenge  their stories during cross-examination,   but many witnesses who had not spoken to  each other since liberation described the   same events in remarkably similar detail.

That  made their testimony difficult to dismiss.

Most of the defendants used the same defense.

They claimed they were simply following orders,   had not personally committed the crimes described,  and were only small parts of a much larger system.

The tribunal listened to these  arguments but rejected them.

On February 3, 1947, the verdicts  were announced.

Eleven of the sixteen   defendants were sentenced to death.

Among the women were Dorothea Binz,   Greta B sel, Elisabeth Marshall,  Vera Salvequart, Margarete Mewes,   Eugenie von Skene, and Gerda Schreiber.

Carmen  Mory also received a death sentence.

The   remaining defendants were given prison sentences  ranging from ten years to life imprisonment.

Hamelin Prison, located about  60 kilometers south of Hannover,   had been chosen by the British military as  the main execution site in their occupation   zone after the war.

It was an  ordinary 19th-century prison,   but it became the place where many convicted  war criminals were executed.

It was also where   Albert Pierrepoint worked whenever the British  military needed executions carried out in Germany.

Pierrepoint was 37 years old in  1947 and had served as Britain’s   chief executioner since 1940.

He  had already hanged William Joyce,   better known as Lord Haw-Haw, the Nazi  radio propagandist, in January 1946.

He had also carried out several executions  after the Bergen-Belsen trial in December 1945,   including those of former camp guards Irma Grese  and Elisabeth Volkenrath.

Pierrepoint was known   for being experienced and highly methodical.

Before every execution, he calculated the exact   drop length based on the prisoner’s weight to  make death as quick as possible.

He worked fast,   often completing the entire process within seconds  of the prisoner entering the execution room.

On the morning of May 2, 1947, the  seven women sentenced to death in   the first Ravensbr ck trial were brought  to the execution chamber at Hamelin.

They   entered one at a time.

Each woman was placed  on the trapdoor with her hands tied behind her   back and her ankles strapped together.

A white hood was placed over her head,   and the noose was positioned beneath the left side  of the jaw.

Pierrepoint pulled the lever himself.

Dorothea Binz was 27 years old.

Witnesses at  the time noted that she showed no visible fear   or distress as she entered the execution  room.

Several observers later said they   found her calmness more unsettling  than if she had cried or begged.

Carmen Mory was not among the women who were  executed that morning.

During the night before   her scheduled execution, she obtained a piece  of broken glass in her cell.

Exactly how she   got it was never fully determined.

She used  it to cut her wrists and died before morning.

The British military officially  recorded her death as a suicide.

These were the first women executed under  the authority of a British military tribunal.

The British military held four more Ravensbr ck  trials between late 1947 and 1948.

Each focused   on a different part of the camp system or on  specific groups of people involved in its crimes.

The second trial, which ended in late 1947,  focused on the medical experiments carried   out at Ravensbr ck.

Between 1942 and 1944, SS  doctors conducted a series of experiments on   74 Polish political prisoners.

All were women,  and most were in their twenties.

Many had been   sent to the camp because of their involvement in  the Polish resistance against Nazi occupation.

The experiments were extremely brutal.

Doctors  deliberately broke bones and sometimes cut   through them with surgical tools to study how  they healed.

They removed sections of muscle   and attempted to replace them with tissue from  other prisoners to see if muscle transplants   were possible.

They also infected wounds with  dangerous bacteria, including streptococcus,   tetanus, and gas gangrene, then withheld  treatment to observe how the infections   progressed.

Some women died during the  experiments.

Others survived but were   left permanently disabled.

Other prisoners  began calling them *Lapins*, meaning rabbits,   because they were used as test subjects.

Eventually, the women adopted the name themselves.

The doctors tried in the second trial were   found guilty on multiple charges.

Several received death sentences.

The third trial took place in 1948 and  focused specifically on the Uckermark subcamp.

Ruth Neudeck, who had supervised the  facility during its final months,   was the main defendant.

Evidence presented during  the trial showed that women sent to Uckermark in   early 1945 received only 200 grams of bread per  day and no other food.

Combined with transfers to   the Ravensbr ck gas chamber, the starvation  policy meant that very few women sent there   survived.

Neudeck was convicted and sentenced  to death.

She was hanged at Hamelin in May 1948.

The fourth and fifth trials dealt with remaining  staff connected to the main Ravensbr ck camp.

Emma   Zimmer, whose role as a senior overseer had been  documented by numerous survivor testimonies, was   convicted and sentenced to death.

Ida Schreiter  received the same sentence for her involvement in   the camp’s daily violence and prisoner selections.

Both women were executed at Hamelin in 1948.

By the end of the fifth trial,  British military courts had   convicted 41 people for crimes committed  at Ravensbr ck.

Across all five trials,   21 death sentences were handed down.

Dozens more served prison sentences.

Most of Ravensbr ck’s female staff disappeared  into postwar Germany and were never prosecuted.

Some obtained false identity papers during  the chaos that followed Germany’s defeat.

Others simply returned home, took off their  uniforms, and resumed ordinary lives under their   real names.

In the late 1940s and throughout the  1950s, West Germany was focused on rebuilding the   country and strengthening its ties with Western  nations through NATO.

There was limited political   support for continuing large-scale investigations  into former concentration camp staff.

The government of Chancellor Konrad Adenauer  often resisted Allied pressure to continue   broad denazification efforts, and many former SS  members quietly returned to professional careers.

A small number of additional cases were brought  in West Germany during the 1950s and 1960s.

These were mainly driven by Fritz Bauer, the  Attorney General of the German state of Hesse.

Bauer later became famous for helping launch  the Frankfurt Auschwitz trials in 1963.

At a   time when many officials preferred to move on  from the past, Bauer considered prosecuting   camp personnel a serious priority.

Even so,  his efforts reached only a small percentage   of those responsible.

West German courts required  stronger evidence for murder convictions than the   British military tribunals had required, and many  cases either collapsed or ended in acquittals.

Historians who studied Ravensbr ck records  after the 1990s, including Bernhard Strebel,   whose 2003 study remains one of the most detailed  works on the camp, estimate that between 3,500   and 3,800 female overseers from Ravensbr ck were  never tried anywhere for any crime.

They lived out   the rest of their lives.

Some had children  and grandchildren who either knew nothing   about their wartime activities or were never told.

Meanwhile, many survivors spent the rest of their   lives carrying physical injuries and psychological  trauma from what they had endured inside the camp.

In 1959, the East German government  established a memorial at Ravensbr ck.

By then,   much of the original camp had already  been demolished.

The memorial still   stands today and receives tens of  thousands of visitors every year.