Posted in

The Northern Gates SEALED. Ukraine ERASES 11 Bridges To Starve Putin’s Army

Ukraine’s drones are now chasing not headlines, but directly bridges.

For months, everyone was fixated on a single structure, the Kerch Bridge.

Every discussion about Crimea always returned to the same question, >> >> when will Ukraine strike Kerch again? But Ukraine didn’t strike Kerch.

Instead, it targeted the massive logistics network surrounding it.

They spent much of June systematically destroying those vital crossings on Crimea’s northern approaches.

In the last 17 days, Ukrainian drones carried out 21 attacks on 11 highway and railway bridges.

Bridges near Armyansk were struck.

Chonhar crossings sustained heavy damage.

Henichesk was placed in the crosshairs.

Russia responded hastily by building pontoon crossings and dirt bypass roads.

Actually, this should have been a very clear warning for Moscow.

Because Russia could repair a struck bridge, set up pontoons, or open new dirt roads.

But it couldn’t make every bridge on the peninsula untouchable.

Ukraine proved this once again.

On the night of June 21st, it destroyed that critical railway bridge over the North Crimean Canal with a drone operation.

Every artery cut in the north makes Russia far more dependent on a single point, that massive Kerch Bridge.

This dependency makes Kerch a bigger target than ever.

Whether Putin’s pride project will be targeted again is a major curiosity, and we will cover this topic in detail.

But first, we need to go back to the night of June 21st.

Near the village of Rozdolna, there was a railway bridge crossing over the North Crimean Canal.

This line connected Kerch to Jankoy, the peninsula’s largest transportation hub, and was the backbone of the logistics corridor through which Russia transported heavy weapons, ammunition, fuel, and personnel to the southern front.

On the night of June 23rd, Ukraine’s special operations forces cut this line.

In the first phase, medium-range strike drones destroyed the tracks and one span of the bridge.

Then they waited.

When Russian repair crews and heavy repair machinery reached the site, the second blow was struck.

The repair crews, machinery, and remaining structure were also destroyed.

The SSO stated in its announcement that the bridge no longer exists and added a message, “The first one is gone.

” This was not a victory declaration, but a program announcement.

The program was already running.

During the same period, the oil depot and thermal power plant in Kerch collapsed.

The fuel terminal at Kavkaz port was set ablaze, and the FSB border guard building in Armyansk was partially destroyed by a drone attack.

From Crimea’s north to south, east to west, every critical logistics node is under simultaneous pressure.

This is a coordinated campaign aimed at paralyzing Crimea’s logistics nervous system.

And this campaign’s ultimate target is the structure everyone knows, but nobody can precisely predict when it will be struck, the Kerch Bridge.

Putin’s $3.

7 billion project has survived three major attacks so far and stood back up every time.

But each recovery was harder than the last.

In October 2022, the SBU collapsed three spans of the highway with a truck bomb and set the railway line ablaze.

Repair took 5 months and truck traffic was permanently moved to the ferry line.

It never returned to the bridge.

In July 2023, the method changed.

SeaBaby naval drones attacked from the water surface, collapsing another section of the highway.

Repair took 3 months and heavy vehicle restrictions became permanent.

In June 2025, the SBU once again changed methods and went underwater.

Using the Marichka unmanned underwater vehicle, 1,100 kg of explosives were placed at the base of the bridge’s support pillars and detonated.

SBU chief Maliuk put the message clearly, “God loves the Trinity and the SBU finishes what it starts.

” Repair was done quickly, but according to British intelligence, inspection alone took weeks.

The pattern is clear.

Every attack uses a different method, each is more sophisticated than the last, and bypasses the defense Russia built against one method by striking from another angle.

The groundwork for the fourth attack may now be underway.

In recent weeks, Ukraine’s strikes systematically weakened the defense infrastructure around Kerch.

S-400 radars and Pantsir air defense systems were denabled.

The oil depot and thermal power plant in Kerch collapsed, and the fuel terminal at Kavkaz port was set ablaze.

These targets were not chosen randomly.

They were parts of the bridge’s defense umbrella and logistic support structure.

A diagram published by a milblogger citing sources close to the Russian Defense Ministry titled “Crimean Bridge: The Ultimate Target of the Blockade” summarizes the exact strategy Ukraine is implementing.

First, suppress air defense, then strike logistics nodes, collapse energy infrastructure, and finally, isolate the bridge itself.

The first three steps are largely completed.

The fourth step is on the table.

But Russia knows this, too, and is building one of the war’s most intense defense concentrations to protect the bridge.

Google Maps recent update revealed this defense network in high quality.

On both sides of the bridge, barge barriers consisting of sunken ship hulls are deployed in rows.

These obstacles, linked together with floating barrels, are designed to physically prevent naval drones from reaching the bridge.

Metal nets are hung beneath the bridge deck to deflect drones coming from the water surface before they reach the support pillars.

Hundreds of structures were sunk underwater and the maps of these structures are classified.

Only Russian pilot vessels can navigate the area.

30-m steel towers were erected at both ends of Tuzla Island and Pantsir-S1 air defense systems were mounted on them.

The height increases detection range.

A 436 BIS target ship was deployed against radar-guided missiles and fighter aircraft fly continuous patrols over the bridge.

Russia even brought a rare Pantsir-S2 version in desert camouflage from Syria and placed it directly on the bridge.

This version was previously known to have been displayed only at the Victory Parade in Tula.

Naval defense is also multi-layered.

Sobol-class fast boats and Grachonok-class anti-sabotage boats patrol around the bridge.

Grachonok specifically carries sonar systems, underwater robots, and a diving chamber to detect underwater drones.

Smoke generators can visually conceal the bridge.

Anti-tank obstacles are deployed on land approaches.

Electronic warfare elements try to disrupt drone navigation by jamming GPS and Starlink signals.

On paper, this defense looks impenetrable.

But in practice, cracks are everywhere.

Barge barriers broke in storms.

Plastic barrels and debris washed up on Kerch’s shore.

In April 2026, Ukrainian naval drones struck and destroyed the Sobol and Grachonok patrol boats protecting the bridge.

So, the defense line itself became a target.

In recent weeks, S-400 radars and Pantsir positions were disabled by Ukraine’s drone and missile combination.

CPA’s analysis summarizes the situation.

The bridge has been largely rendered ineffective for heavy cargo transport and the air defense resources Russia directs at the bridge leave other fronts defenseless.

Because Ukraine’s naval drone fleet is now something very different from the fishing boat of 2022.

The story began with an order given to four engineers.

Do something about the enemy navy.

Their answer was a cut-down fishing boat hull, Magura V1.

Within 3 years, this prototype turned into a weapons family that wrote war history.

In February 2024, Magura V5S sank the Russian Ivanovets Corvette, the first case of a naval drone sinking an enemy warship.

The same year, the Magura V6 version was equipped with a Russian R-73 air missile and shot down a Russian Mi-8 helicopter over the Black Sea, the first case of a naval drone hitting an aerial target.

And in May 2025, the Magura V7 entered the stage.

This drone, equipped with two AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missiles, shot down two Russian Su-30SM fighter jets over the Black Sea.

A naval drone shooting down a fighter jet happened for the first time in history.

Ukraine developed this technology so effectively that the American company Red Cat began producing the Magura V7 under license.

The design is Ukraine’s, and the evolution didn’t stop.

Sea baby drones now carry 850 kg warheads, 12.

7 mm machine guns, and RPV-16 thermobaric rockets with a 1,000 km range.

The drone carrier version can strike land targets by launching four FPV attack drones from the sea surface.

Underwater, the Toloka and Marichka unmanned underwater vehicles are opening a new front.

Systems that can pass under surface barriers are extremely difficult to detect and can wait like loitering torpedoes and strike autonomously.

Marichka is assessed to have been used in the 2025 Kerch Bridge attack.

And the structure coordinating all these systems is also unique.

The 385th unmanned naval vehicles brigade, established in August 2023, is the world’s first USV unit, unifying Magura, Sea Baby, and underwater vehicles under a single command.

And when this evolution on the naval front combines with the expansion on land, Crimea’s situation becomes increasingly indefensible.

In 2023, Ukraine tried to cut the land bridge with tanks and failed.

The Zaporizhzhia counteroffensive couldn’t even reach Tokmak.

In 2026, drones are doing what tanks couldn’t.

Ukraine’s medium-range strike campaign is systematically cutting Russia’s land corridor, the vital resupply line stretching from Rostov through Mariupol, Berdiansk, and Melitopol to Crimea.

Russians call this road the Novorossiya route.

Ukrainians call it the death road, and the name is proving right.

Unmanned Systems Forces Commander Madyar announced that Russian military cargo traffic on this route dropped 71% and said, “Within a month, we will achieve full control over the road.

” The Azov National Guard Brigade recaptured air control around Mariupol with drones, a symbolic return 2 years after Azovstal.

In May alone, at least 17 fuel and military trucks were set ablaze between Melitopol and Crimea.

The road has been closed to civilian traffic since late May, and the drone’s guidance system also changed.

In the terminal phase, the target is captured by AI.

Whether under electronic warfare pressure or not, whether there’s a connection or not, the drone locks onto its own target.

Between June 7th to 11th, this campaign reached its peak.

The Chonhar bridge was struck for the first time on June 7th.

The second blow came 2 days later, and the bridge was completely destroyed.

On June 10th, the Henichesk Arabat Spit bridge was downloaded by a missile attack.

The following night, four bridges in the Armyansk-Perekop corridor were struck in waves.

In ISW’s assessment, Ukraine temporarily disabled all land routes between occupied Kherson and Crimea.

Approximately 50 Russian military vehicles were destroyed in these operations.

Defense Minister Fedorov summarized the situation.

Our drone campaign is turning Crimea into an island.

And former US European Forces Commander Hodges confirmed this strategy’s logic.

Crimea is this war’s focal point.

Whoever controls it wins the war.

The first step is to isolate the peninsula, then make it impossible for Russian forces to stay.

887 km of anti-drone road defense built in less than 6 months.

9.

2 km added every day forms both the attack and defense infrastructure of this corridor.

Russia now faces a very bad choice, risking the land route to move heavy loads across the Kerch Bridge, which is under its own separate threat, or using longer and more vulnerable alternative roads.

Both options are costing Russia dearly, and the numbers show the scale of this price.

Defense Minister Fedorov announced on June 22nd, in the first half of 2026, Ukrainian drones struck more than 800,000 confirmed Russian military targets.

In May alone, 181,000 targets were eliminated and 31,530 Russian soldiers were neutralized or severely wounded.

May became this year’s most productive month.

The most striking number Fedorov shared, more than 90% of enemy targets are now being struck by unmanned aerial vehicles.

The drone is no longer the war’s auxiliary tool.

It’s the primary weapon.

And this intensity pushed Russia’s personnel losses to record levels.

Between June 1st and June 22nd, Russia experienced daily losses exceeding 1,000 soldiers for the first time since March 2025, an uninterrupted loss streak lasting 3 weeks.

According to Army Inform data, Russian forces suffered $331 million in military equipment losses in a single day alone.

Tanks, armored vehicles, artillery systems, air defense elements, and transport vehicles.

And the system feeding this war machine is as innovative as the war itself.

Ukraine’s ePoints incentive program gives military units digital points for every approved strike.

Units exchange these points for new drones, ground robot systems, and electronic warfare equipment through the Brave1 marketplace.

In Fedorov’s words, “We can see which technologies and units produce the best results and rapidly scale these solutions across the entire army.

” A model entirely different from the classical war supply chain, decentralized, performance-based, and digital.

The system doesn’t just describe weapons, it measures which weapon is most effective under which conditions, and reflects this data in production decisions.

In conclusion, Ukraine’s drone warfare is as much a systems engineering matter as a technology matter.

And this system’s outputs are seen in their most concrete form in Crimea.

Concrete in Crimea, but underestimating Russia’s adaptation capacity would be a mistake.

Russia has a proven ability in repair.

The Kerch Bridge was opened to traffic after every attack.

Temporary pontoon crossings are being built for struck bridges, dirt bypass roads are being opened, and alternative railway routes are being activated.

Infrastructure can be repaired faster than social media commentators imagine.

Transportation to Crimea via the southern railway line is still possible, and air logistics, though expensive, can be activated for emergency resupply.

Russia is also increasing maritime resupply by expanding Kerch Strait ferry lines.

Capacity is far below the bridge but not zero.

There are also points to question on the Ukrainian side.

The production, ammunition, and operator cost of a drone campaign at this intensity is high.

800,000 targets is impressive, but sustainability is not guaranteed.

Russia is constantly updating its electronic warfare capabilities, and even fiber optic guided drones may not be effective in every condition.

Permanently destroying every bridge in Crimea may not be realistic.

Modern infrastructure can be repaired repeatedly, and Russia’s engineering capacity in this area is strong.

But each of these counter arguments carries a weakness within itself.

Russia can repair, but every repair consumes resources and time.

Repair crews are targeted with second strikes, and the repaired structure’s capacity drops each time.

The ferry line works, but it’s not at a capacity to feed 60,000 soldiers, and the ferries themselves are also drone targets.

Air logistics is possible, but not at a scale to meet a garrison’s needs.

Electronic warfare is strengthening, but Ukraine’s AI-guided drones can lock onto their own targets even without a connection.

And most importantly, Ukraine’s aim is not to permanently destroy every bridge anyway.

It’s to disrupt the system, increase the cost, and make it mandatory for Russia to pull resources from the front.

These effects are accumulating and accumulating fast.

If three new bridges are being struck while Russia is repairing one, the math works in the attacker’s favor.

Ukraine proves this math every night.

For months, everyone was fixated on the Kerch Bridge, waiting for when the big blow would come.

But Ukraine chased not headlines, but bridges.

It destroyed the canal bridge, cut the land corridor, shut fuel lines, disabled radars, and sank patrol boats.

The so-said, “The first one is gone.

” But the real message is this.

It may not even be necessary to destroy the Kerch Bridge because every artery leading to it has already been cut.

Do you think Ukraine will launch the fourth major attack on the Kerch Bridge or will it not even be necessary? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Subscribe to the Geo Network.

Thank you for watching.

One final reminder.

If you’re thinking, “I want the analysis to continue even when I step away from the screen.

” We also await you on Spotify to shorten your long drives and turn traffic into an enjoyable listening experience.

Disclaimer : This content may be created by AI for entertainment purposes. Any resemblance to real persons, events, or places is coincidental.