On the morning of December the 17th, 2011, a man died alone on a train somewhere in the North Korean countryside.
For two full days, the outside world knew nothing about it.
The people closest to him, his inner circle, his generals, his son, had to decide very carefully what happened next.
And while they were deciding, an entire nation of 24 million people continued their lives in complete ignorance of the fact that the man who had controlled every aspect of those lives was already gone.
This is the story of those final hours and of the regime that made what came after them possible.
The last confirmed public appearance of Kim Jong-il took place on December 15th, 2011, just 2 days before his death.
When North Korean state media released footage of him standing on an escalator inside the newly completed Kwangbok Region Grand Mart in Pyongyang.
He appeared in good spirits, touring the facility as part of his ongoing campaign of what the regime called field guidance visits.
Personal inspections of factories, military units, farms, and civic projects that had defined his public image for decades.
In the final week of his life, Kim had been relentlessly busy, at least by the account of the North Korean state.
On December 10th, he had traveled to South Hamgyong province to inspect shoe and chemical factories.
On December 13th, he visited the Pyongyang Capital Guard unit.
On December 15th, the shopping center.
And in between those documented stops, he had reportedly also visited the Hana Music Information Center, where North Korean state media content was produced.
He was, according to everything the regime wished the world to see, a leader fully in command, active and engaged, driving his country forward toward the celebratory milestone the following year would bring, the 100th anniversary of the birth of his father, Kim Il-sung, the founder of North Korea.
A year that had been officially designated as the beginning of a mighty and prosperous nation.
None of it quite matched reality.
Kim Jong-il had not been a healthy man since August 2008, when he suffered a severe cerebrovascular event, a serious medical episode affecting blood flow to the brain, that left him in intensive care at Pyongyang’s Red Cross Hospital, reportedly in a coma.
The North Korean regime said nothing publicly about the episode.
The outside world first grew suspicious when Kim failed to appear at the military parade marking North Korea’s 60th anniversary on September 9th, 2008.
His absence from such a politically critical ceremony was essentially unprecedented.
Foreign intelligence services began piecing together what had happened.
The full picture only became clear after Kim’s death, when a French neurosurgeon named Dr.
François-Xavier Roux confirmed that he had been urgently flown to North Korea in August 2008.
In an operation so secret that he was not told who his patient would be until he arrived and found Kim lying unconscious in an intensive care bed.
Roux described finding his patient in intensive care and in a critical condition.
He spent approximately 1 to 2 weeks in North Korea, from August into early September, working alongside the local medical team.
He later confirmed that his intervention had been instrumental in bringing Kim back to consciousness.
He also noted that after an event of that severity, the risk of further life-threatening episodes increases over time.
Kim had recovered enough to resume public appearances by late 2008, but South Korean intelligence reported throughout 2010 that he was exhibiting signs of significant cognitive decline during his field visits, occasionally saying things that did not follow logically from the conversations around him.
His weight had dropped noticeably.
His movements were stiff.
The man conducting field inspections in December 2011 was doing so on a body that had been in a slow decline for more than 3 years.
On the evening of December 16th, 2011, Kim Jong-il boarded his personal armored train.
He had used this train for virtually all his travel for years, not only because it was his preference, but because he distrusted North Korea’s aging fleet of Soviet-era aircraft and had consistently refused to fly.
The train he traveled in was not an ordinary vehicle, constructed with reinforced armor plating, bulletproof glass, and heavily fortified walls and floors.
It carried its own communications infrastructure, including satellite phones that allowed Kim to remain in constant contact with Pyongyang.
It was accompanied by two additional trains, one that swept ahead to check the tracks, another that followed behind carrying bodyguards, support personnel, and medical staff.
Before each station the train approached, approximately 100 security agents were deployed in advance to inspect the platform.
Inside, the train was designed for the permanent comfort of one passenger.
There was a bedroom carriage, a bathroom carriage, a luxury dining carriage capable of preparing dishes from Korean, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, and French cuisines, and a conference carriage.
It was, in every meaningful sense, a mobile palace, the one environment in which Kim Jong-il could move through his own country and feel entirely insulated from it at the same time.
On the morning of December the 17th, somewhere during what state media later described as a field guidance tour, Kim Jong-il suffered what medical authorities described as an acute myocardial infarction, a major cardiac event affecting the heart.
The prior years of health decline had set the stage.
He was 69 years old.
At 8:30 in the morning, he was gone.
What happened in the hours that followed would reveal more clearly than almost anything that had happened during his lifetime exactly how the system he had built actually functioned.
The world did not learn of Kim Jong-il’s death until December 19th, 2011, 51 hours after it occurred.
That interval was not an accident, and it was not simply the result of logistical challenges in a country with limited communications infrastructure.
North Korea had satellite phones.
It had state television and a national radio network capable of reaching the entire population simultaneously.
The 51-hour delay was a deliberate political decision.
An understanding why it was made requires understanding what was actually at stake in those hours.
Kim Jong-il had been grooming his youngest son, Kim Jong-un, as his successor since at least 2009.
The process had accelerated significantly after the 2008 health episode.
In September 2010, Kim Jong-un had been publicly elevated to senior positions within the Korean Workers’ Party and the military at a rare party conference, his first formal introduction to the North Korean political world.
He was in his late 20s, possibly younger, and almost entirely unknown outside of a small circle of the regime’s inner hierarchy.
The outside world, including the intelligence services of South Korea, Japan, and the United States, had only fragmentary information about him, a name, some photographs, and very little else.
The senior figures of the North Korean state, the party officials, the military commanders, the security apparatus chiefs who had spent decades operating under Kim Jong-il’s absolute authority, now faced the question of whether they would transfer that authority to a young man most of them barely knew under circumstances of maximum uncertainty in a country that was already under intense international pressure over its nuclear program.
They needed time to agree on the official version of events.
They needed to settle on the language that would be used.
They needed to ensure that the military remained stable and that no factions moved to assert independent authority in the vacuum created by the news.
The 51 hours were, in essence, the time required to manage the internal politics of succession before the announcement created the conditions for those politics to become publicly contested.
On the morning of December 19th, work units across North Korea, factories, schools, government offices, military installations, were informed that an important announcement would be broadcast at noon.
The phrasing was deliberate.
North Koreans had heard language like this before.
Most adults were old enough to remember the announcement of Kim Il-sung’s death in 1994.
They understood what a special broadcast from the Korean Central Television newsroom was likely to mean.
At noon, Ri Chun-hi, the most recognizable news anchor in North Korea, who had delivered major state announcements for decades and had been part of the broadcast coverage of Kim Il-sung’s death in 1994, appeared on screen in full black mourning attire.
She announced that Kim Jong-il, general secretary of the Workers’ Party of Korea, chairman of the National Defense Commission, and supreme commander of the Korean People’s Army, had died 2 days earlier on his train of cardiac failure brought on by what the official announcement described as intense mental and physical exertion in the service of the Korean people.
The reaction that followed was unlike anything seen in most of the world in the modern era.
The footage broadcast by North Korean state television in the days after the announcement showed scenes of mass public mourning that were, by any standard outside of North Korea, extraordinary in their intensity.
Crowds gathered in the squares and public spaces of Pyongyang, collapsing to their knees, calling out to the image of their dead leader in words of anguish and disbelief.
People wept in factory courtyards, in school gymnasiums, on street corners in the cold December air.
Soldiers stood in formation and cried openly.
The wailing, which was captured on broadcast cameras and distributed to international news organizations, was continuous, collective, and overwhelming in its apparent sincerity.
The temperature in Pyongyang on December 19th was approximately minus 2° C.
Official mourners were reportedly forbidden from wearing hats, gloves, or scarves so that authorities could see their faces and verify that their expressions of grief were sufficiently genuine.
That detail, that warmth itself, was rationed based on the performance of sorrow captured something essential about how grief operated inside the Kim dynasty’s North Korea.
In a country where the political system was built on the total subordination of private experience to public obligation, grief was not simply an emotion.
It was a demonstration of loyalty, and its performance was monitored.
Reports later emerged from defectors and international monitoring organizations that people who had not attended organized morning sessions or whose grief had not appeared convincing enough to observers face serious consequences, including sentences to labor camps of 6 months or more.
North
Korea officially denied these accounts.
Whether the grief was genuine, performed, or some complex mixture of both is a question that cannot be fully answered from the outside.
A population that had lived its entire existence under a system of total information control where foreign media was banned, where the regime’s mythology was the only permitted historical framework, where Kim Jong Il had been presented since birth as a near divine figure of incomparable wisdom and sacrifice contained people whose relationship to
the news of his death was not easily categorized.
Some wept from genuine devastation, some wept from calculated survival instinct.
Many probably could not have told the difference themselves.
What was unambiguous was the machinery behind the grief.
The state apparatus for managing emotion was as elaborate as any other component of the North Korean system and it had been decades in the making.
To understand what Kim Jong Il left behind in December 2011, it is necessary to understand what he had spent his adult life constructing.
Kim Jong Il was born in 1941 in the Soviet Far East, most likely near Khabarovsk where his father, Kim Il Sung, was commanding a battalion of Korean and Chinese exiles as part of the Soviet Brigade.
The official North Korean version of this basic fact was replaced by a mythology.
Kim Jong Il, the state declared, had been born in 1942 on the sacred slopes of Mount Paektu the highest peak on the Korean Peninsula in a secret guerrilla camp at the exact moment that a star appeared in the sky and a double rainbow arched over the mountain.
The year was adjusted to 1942 the year of Kim Il Sung’s 30th birthday to create an ideological symmetry that served the regime’s myth-making purposes.
The mythology was not incidental.
It was the structural foundation on which his entire rule would be built.
He rose through the Korean Workers’ Party through the 1960s and 1970s managing the regime’s cultural and propaganda apparatus with exceptional skill.
By 1974, he had been identified internally as his father’s likely successor.
By 1980, this had been made public within North Korea.
He formally assumed leadership after Kim Il Sung’s death in 1994 and ruled until his own death 17 years later.
The system he operated was not simply an authoritarian state.
It was something considerably more total.
North Korea under Kim Jong Il maintained a classification system for its entire population called songbun a form of inherited political categorization based on the loyalty record of one’s family going back to the Korean War and even earlier.
A person’s songbun classification determined where they could live what work they could do what food rations they received whether their children could attend university and whether they were considered sufficiently trustworthy to live in Pyongyang a city that functioned as a
showcase capital carefully maintained at a higher standard than the rest of the country and populated selectively with those whose loyalty ratings made them eligible.
Those at the bottom of the songbun system descendants of people who had collaborated with the Japanese colonial administration or who had family members who had fled to South Korea or who had been denounced for political unreliability at any point lived lives of systematic disadvantage that passed from generation to generation with no mechanism for appeal
or revision.
And for those who actively defied the regime or were simply accused of having done so there was the kwanliso system a network of large-scale political prison camps holding an estimated 80,000 to 120,000 people at the time of Kim’s death according to United Nations estimates.
These were not short-term detention facilities.
They were permanent institutions to which entire families could be sent including the children and sometimes the grandchildren of those originally accused.
Camp survivors, in testimony gathered by human rights organizations described conditions of severe forced labor systematic starvation extreme abuse by guards, public executions >> >> and a mortality rate that meant a substantial percentage of those who entered never left.
The largest of these facilities were visible from satellite imagery.
Their existence could not be credibly denied.
The North Korean government acknowledged the existence of what it called re-education facilities, but dismissed accounts of conditions inside them as fabrications by hostile foreign powers.
Kim Jong Il knew about all of it.
According to testimony from Hwang Jang Yop the most senior North Korean official ever to defect to the South who had served as a senior ideological figure in the regime before fleeing in 1997 Kim Jong Il did not simply permit the system to function in the background.
He was briefed on it.
He demanded reports on it.
He personally directed details of the state apparatus at a level of granular involvement that his own father had never maintained.
While the prison camps operated and the songbun system determined the life outcomes of millions Kim Jong Il’s personal lifestyle occupied a different universe entirely.
The gap between the conditions in which the majority of North Koreans lived and the conditions in which Kim Jong Il spent his personal life was not merely wide.
It was almost impossible to measure in conventional terms.
Kim had access to at least 17 official residences and palaces across the country, according to intelligence assessments.
He maintained a collection of hundreds of foreign films and was reportedly the largest individual purchaser of Hennessy cognac in the world at one point in the 1990s.
He imported live lobsters and cases of fine French Bordeaux and Burgundy wines for consumption on his personal train.
Former Russian diplomat Konstantin Pulikovsky who traveled with Kim on his armored train through Russia in 2001 later wrote in detail about the extraordinary range of dishes available on board Korean, Chinese Japanese Russian and French cuisines all prepared fresh with wines chosen specifically for each course.
Young female entertainers performed throughout the journey.
Meanwhile between the early 1990s and the late 1990s North Korea was experiencing one of the worst famines to strike any country in the latter half of the 20th century.
The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 had severed the flow of subsidized food oil, and technical support on which North Korea’s Stalinist economic system had been entirely dependent.
The country’s agricultural infrastructure which relied on inputs it could no longer afford to import, began to fail.
Floods struck in 1995 and 1996 devastating crops in a country where only about 18% of the land was arable to begin with.
The state food distribution system through which the regime had for decades rationed food according to political usefulness collapsed entirely in many provinces outside Pyongyang.
The famine that followed, known in North Korean official language as the arduous march killed somewhere between 240,000 and 3.
5 million people depending on which methodology and which sources are used.
The range reflects both the genuine difficulty of gathering demographic data in a closed country and the deliberate efforts of the North Korean state to prevent any accurate accounting.
The United States Census Bureau’s 2011 analysis estimated the number of excess deaths between 1993 and 2000 at between 500,000 and 600,000.
Kim Jong Il was briefed regularly on the death toll.
According to testimony from Hwang Jang Yop and other defectors the regime understood from early in the crisis that people were dying in large numbers and made a deliberate decision to prioritize the military and the political elite in food allocation a policy captured in the songun or military first ideology that Kim formally adopted as the guiding principle of his state.
The
Korean People’s Army, which was the regime’s primary instrument of both external deterrence and internal control, was fed first.
Government officials were fed second.
Those deemed politically unreliable those in remote provinces far from the capital and those held in the prison camp system were fed last or not at all.
International food aid eventually reached North Korea from China, South Korea, and Western organizations but the regime maintained control of its distribution, and there was substantial evidence that portions of it were diverted to the military and political institutions, rather than reaching the populations most in need.
The famine ended in a technical sense by the late 1990s.
Food insecurity did not.
Through the 2000s, the economy remained fragile, and the population continued to depend on an informal market system that the regime alternately tolerated and suppressed, depending on its political calculations at any given moment.
In 2009, Kim Jong-il personally authorized a sudden redenomination of the North Korean won, a currency reform that wiped out the savings that ordinary people had accumulated through years of market trading, causing widespread panic and what intelligence reports described as open expressions of public anger in a
country where open expressions of any kind were extraordinarily dangerous.
The currency reform was eventually reversed, and the official held responsible was reportedly executed.
Through all of it, the nuclear weapons program continued.
No account of Kim Jong-il’s rule can be separated from the nuclear weapons program that defined his relationship with the outside world for the entirety of his tenure.
North Korea’s nuclear ambitions predated Kim Jong-il’s formal leadership.
His father had pursued them as well, but it was under Kim that the program crossed the threshold from aspiration to capability.
The first confirmed North Korean test took place on October 9th, 2006, when a device was detonated underground in the country’s mountainous northeast.
The yield was relatively modest by international standards, but the test confirmed what many had long suspected.
North Korea had developed a functional nuclear device, making it the world’s ninth nuclear armed state.
The international response was a combination of condemnation, sanctions, and renewed diplomatic engagement.
The United Nations Security Council passed resolutions requiring North Korea to halt its program.
China, the regime’s primary economic partner, and the country through which the vast majority of North Korea’s trade flowed, publicly expressed displeasure.
The United States, South Korea, Japan, China, and Russia engaged in a prolonged diplomatic framework called the Six-Party Talks, aimed at finding some mechanism by which North Korea would agree to stop or roll back its nuclear development in exchange for economic concessions and security
guarantees.
The talks produced occasional apparent breakthroughs, and many more occasions of deadlock.
Kim Jong-il participated in them or authorized his representatives to participate in a manner that outside analysts consistently described as deliberate and strategic, rather than sincere.
The nuclear program was not a bargaining chip to be given up under the right conditions.
It was the foundational guarantee of the regime’s survival, the one asset that made North Korea impossible to dismiss or eliminate without unacceptable consequences.
Kim Jong-il had drawn conclusions from the fates of governments around the world that had relinquished or abandoned such programs.
His son would maintain those same conclusions.
North Korea conducted a second underground nuclear test on May 25th, 2009, in defiance of United Nations resolutions and international pressure.
The regime framed this as a sovereign right to self-defense.
The test produced another round of sanctions and another round of diplomatic discussions that went nowhere definitive.
By the time of Kim Jong-il’s death in December 2011, North Korea possessed a small but functional nuclear arsenal and was actively working to develop the delivery systems that would make that arsenal a credible strategic threat across the region.
The program had survived every diplomatic effort to constrain it.
It had survived the economic devastation of the 1990s.
It had survived international isolation and sanctions, and it would survive its architect.
The question of who would follow Kim Jong-il had occupied analysts, intelligence services, and North Korea watchers for years before his death, particularly after the 2008 health crisis.
Kim had three sons from two different relationships.
His eldest, Kim Jong-nam, had been considered a potential successor in the 1990s, but had fatally undermined his position in 2001 when he was caught trying to enter Japan on a forged Dominican Republic passport with a group of companions, apparently intending to visit Tokyo Disneyland.
The incident was an embarrassment of the kind that North Korean propaganda simply could not absorb.
Kim Jong-nam was never seriously considered for succession afterward, >> >> and spent subsequent years living a peripatetic existence between Macau, Beijing, and various other locations outside North Korea, never returning to a significant political role.
He was killed at Kuala Lumpur International Airport in February 2017 in a highly public assassination that the United States attributed to North Korean state agents.
The middle son, Kim Jong-chul, was reportedly considered too mild-mannered for the demands of running a totalitarian state.
Kim Jong-il reportedly described him to associates in terms that suggested he lacked the necessary disposition for leadership.
That left the youngest son, Kim Jong-un, born in either 1983 or 1984, the exact date remaining uncertain even to many outside analysts, who had been educated partly at a private school in Bern, Switzerland, under a false name before returning to North Korea to complete his education and begin his political
preparation.
He had been publicly elevated within the party at the September 2010 Workers’ Party Conference, but as of December 2011, he remained largely a cipher to the outside world.
Reports emerged on January 1st, 2012, that Kim Jong-nam had secretly traveled to Pyongyang from Macau on December 17th, 2011, the day of his father’s death, apparently after receiving private word of what had happened.
He is believed to have accompanied Kim Jong-un in paying respects to their father’s body.
He departed again quietly, not attending the official public funeral, apparently to avoid any speculation about the succession that his presence might have generated.
On December 19th, when the announcement of Kim’s death was made, Kim Jong-un was simultaneously proclaimed by the Korean Central News Agency as the great successor to the revolutionary cause of Juche, language carefully chosen to embed him within the ideological framework his
father had built.
The transition was presented as seamless, inevitable, and preordained.
The official state media published a photograph of Kim Jong-un weeping at his father’s bier at the Kumsusan Memorial Palace, where the elder Kim’s embalmed body lay in a glass coffin, draped in the red flag of North Korea, and surrounded by the red Kimjongilia flowers that bore his name.
The image was intended to convey both filial devotion and the continuity of dynastic authority in a single frame.
On December 28th, the funeral procession moved through the streets of Pyongyang in temperatures well below freezing.
Kim Jong-un walked alongside the hearse.
The most powerful generals and party officials walked with him.
The cameras captured everything, and the images were broadcast to the nation and to the world, a young, untested heir surrounded by the machinery of power his father had spent a lifetime perfecting, preparing to step into a role that would determine the lives of millions of people who had no say in any of it.
Kim Jong-il lay in state at the Kumsusan Memorial Palace, the same institution where his father, Kim Il-sung, had been placed after his death in 1994, and where both bodies remain on permanent public display to this day.
In keeping with North Korean custom, the body was embalmed and placed in a glass coffin, preserved for what is functionally an indefinite period in a palace that had been converted from Kim Il-sung’s primary official residence into a mausoleum and monument to the dynasty’s founding mythology.
The mourning period ran officially from December 17th to December 29th.
Citizens across the country were organized into sessions of collective grief.
The mandatory nature of these gatherings was not acknowledged officially, but was understood by everyone who participated.
Defectors who left North Korea in subsequent years reported that the social memory of the mourning period was complex.
People understood that the performances they had given were performances, but that the performance itself had been real in its consequences.
The December 19th announcement and the 51 hours of silence that preceded it had, in the end, achieved exactly what the regime needed them to achieve.
The military did not fracture.
No senior official moved independently to claim power.
The succession to Kim Jong-un proceeded without visible internal disruption.
South Korea placed its military on heightened alert the moment the announcement was made.
The United States National Security Council convened for an emergency meeting, focused primarily on whether the succession would produce the kind of internal instability that might generate unpredictable external behavior, a military provocation, a miscalculation, a border incident in a region where such incidents had already produced deaths as
recently as 2010, when the sinking of the South Korean naval corvette Cheonan killed 46 sailors, an act attributed to a North Korean torpedo.
None of that instability materialized publicly in the immediate term.
Kim Jong-un consolidated power over the following months and years, not without violence as the 2013 execution of his uncle and political mentor, Jang Song Thaek, would later demonstrate.
But with enough effectiveness to make clear that the regime Kim Jong-il had spent his life constructing was durable enough to outlast him.
The country Kim Jong-un inherited was one where an estimated 80,000 to 120,000 people remained imprisoned in political camps, where the songbun classification system continued to determine the life possibilities of every family, where the famine had ended but food insecurity remained endemic, where a nuclear weapons program was actively advancing, where an entire population had been
taught from birth to understand their nation through a mythology so comprehensive that questioning it carried lethal risk.
The train that Kim Jong-il died on was eventually placed on display in Pyongyang alongside the trains of his father.
The glass coffin at Kumsusan receives a steady stream of organized visitors from across the country who come in ordered groups and bow in the prescribed manner before the preserved body of the man whose death was kept from them for 51 hours.
In December 2011, a man died alone on a train in the North Korean countryside.
The machinery of the state he had built ensured that this fact would be managed, controlled, and delivered to the world on precisely the schedule and in precisely the terms that served the system’s interests.
That, more than almost anything else about him, tells you what kind of state Kim Jong-il actually ran.
If you enjoyed this video, please like and subscribe to our channel so you never miss out on more history documentaries.
